{ "schema": "audit_recommendation_follow_up_ledger_v01", "issue": 310, "generated_date": "2026-06-27", "source_references": [304, 306, 308, 269], "priority_model": { "P0": "must resolve before more backlog execution because it affects governance correctness or repo safety", "P1": "should resolve before related implementation lane starts", "P2": "useful but not blocking", "P3": "backlog hygiene only" }, "allowed_status_values": ["proposed", "owner-review", "blocked", "ready-for-ticket", "no-action", "deferred"], "categories": [ "Mandatory governance cleanup", "Missing follow-up implementation tickets", "Owner-review decisions", "OKF implementation path", "Google SDLC implementation path", "Multi-agent orchestration implementation path", "Source Registry Admin continuation", "Label cleanup and parent/child linkage cleanup" ], "rows": [ { "ledger_id": "ARL-001", "source_audit_finding": "#304 found closure-reality classification gaps where documentation, evaluation, architecture, workflow scaffold, and source/corpus closures can be mistaken for implemented runtime capability.", "related_issues": [304, 306, 308], "related_prs": [305, 307, 309], "category": "Mandatory governance cleanup", "current_reality": "Closure taxonomy exists, but the audit findings need an executable cleanup path before more backlog execution depends on them.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Tighter closeout wording and evidence requirements for implementation-reality classifications.", "recommended_next_action": "Create a governance cleanup ticket that tightens closure-reality wording and closeout evidence requirements.", "priority_recommendation": "P0", "dependency_notes": "Depends on #304 baseline and #306 delta rule.", "owner_review_required": false, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Tighten closure-reality classification gates v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P1", "area:workflow", "area:operating-model", "type:governance", "type:operations"], "hard_boundaries": ["planning and governance only", "do not reopen issues", "do not relabel existing issues or PRs"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not start implementation lanes from this row"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Prevents documentation or evaluation closures from being reused as implementation proof.", "status": "ready-for-ticket" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-002", "source_audit_finding": "#304 found 9 closed issues needing label cleanup.", "related_issues": [304], "related_prs": [305], "category": "Mandatory governance cleanup", "current_reality": "Label gaps are known but no cleanup pass is authorized by this ledger.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Additive label cleanup decision and execution surface.", "recommended_next_action": "Decide whether label cleanup is owner-reviewed metadata work or a separate additive child issue.", "priority_recommendation": "P1", "dependency_notes": "Requires owner choice before metadata mutation.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Apply closed-issue label cleanup from #304 audit v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P1", "area:workflow", "type:governance", "type:operations"], "hard_boundaries": ["do not relabel existing issues in this ledger"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not mutate GitHub labels without a later explicit ticket"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Separates audit finding from metadata execution.", "status": "owner-review" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-003", "source_audit_finding": "#304 found parent/child linkage cleanup flags and reinforced that parent/meta issues must remain open unless explicitly closed by the owner.", "related_issues": [269, 271, 304], "related_prs": [305], "category": "Mandatory governance cleanup", "current_reality": "#269 and #271 remain open and must not be closed by this ledger.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Stronger parent/meta issue closure protection if current template or validator coverage is insufficient.", "recommended_next_action": "Add a focused governance cleanup ticket if template or validator coverage needs stronger parent/meta protection.", "priority_recommendation": "P0", "dependency_notes": "Depends on parent/meta closure rule from #304.", "owner_review_required": false, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Harden parent and meta issue closure protection v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P1", "area:workflow", "area:operating-model", "type:governance"], "hard_boundaries": ["do not close #269", "do not close or start #271"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not start Source Registry Admin or extraction-profile implementation"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Prevents parent or meta issue closure through child-slice closeout drift.", "status": "ready-for-ticket" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-004", "source_audit_finding": "#304 found merged PRs with no labels and PR label gaps that reduce closeout evidence quality.", "related_issues": [304], "related_prs": [305], "category": "Mandatory governance cleanup", "current_reality": "PR label cleanup is known but not authorized.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "PR label cleanup execution model.", "recommended_next_action": "Choose whether PR label cleanup should be automated, manually owner-reviewed, or split into a metadata-only child issue.", "priority_recommendation": "P2", "dependency_notes": "Requires owner decision because it mutates historical GitHub metadata.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Review and apply merged-PR label cleanup from #304 audit v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P2", "area:workflow", "type:governance", "type:operations"], "hard_boundaries": ["do not relabel existing PRs in this ledger"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not mutate GitHub metadata without explicit authorization"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Keeps historical metadata cleanup explicit and reviewable.", "status": "owner-review" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-005", "source_audit_finding": "#304, #306, and #308 added governance controls that need durable recommendation grouping.", "related_issues": [304, 306, 308], "related_prs": [305, 307, 309], "category": "Mandatory governance cleanup", "current_reality": "Validator coverage exists for closure governance and anti-manual-toil controls.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Ledger-specific validator coverage and durable decision surface.", "recommended_next_action": "Keep validator coverage tied to the ledger so future governance drift fails mechanically.", "priority_recommendation": "P0", "dependency_notes": "Extends existing validation/scripts/check_backlog_closure_governance.py surface.", "owner_review_required": false, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Maintain audit recommendation ledger validator coverage v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P1", "area:workflow", "type:governance", "type:operations"], "hard_boundaries": ["validator change only", "no runtime behavior change"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not implement recommendation lanes"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Prevents future loss of the grouped recommendation contract.", "status": "ready-for-ticket" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-006", "source_audit_finding": "#304 found 22 ambiguous closures requiring owner review before any reopen decision.", "related_issues": [304], "related_prs": [305], "category": "Mandatory governance cleanup", "current_reality": "Ambiguous closures are identified but not dispositioned.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Owner-review disposition pass.", "recommended_next_action": "Create an owner-review disposition pass before reopening, closing, or relabeling ambiguous items.", "priority_recommendation": "P0", "dependency_notes": "Disposition states must include keep closed, reopen, spawn child issue, no implementation planned, and defer with rationale.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Run owner-review disposition pass for ambiguous #304 closures v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P1", "area:workflow", "area:operating-model", "type:governance"], "hard_boundaries": ["do not reopen issues in this ledger", "do not close open issues in this ledger"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not decide dispositions without owner review"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Converts ambiguous closure work into explicit owner decisions.", "status": "owner-review" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-007", "source_audit_finding": "#304 found missing OKF implementation tracking.", "related_issues": [285, 304], "related_prs": [288, 305], "category": "Missing follow-up implementation tickets", "current_reality": "OKF is an architecture decision only.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "OKF-compatible bundle artifacts, projections, index generation, adapter behavior, and validation.", "recommended_next_action": "Suggest a child issue for OKF-compatible bundle artifact generation.", "priority_recommendation": "P1", "dependency_notes": "Depends on owner choosing OKF lane before #271 or runtime indexing work.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Implement OKF-compatible bundle artifact generation v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P1", "area:context-pack", "area:grounded-assistant", "area:data-boundary", "type:architecture"], "hard_boundaries": ["do not implement OKF in this ledger"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not add database, vector, or MCP behavior"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Prevents architecture decisions from being read as generated artifact implementation.", "status": "ready-for-ticket" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-008", "source_audit_finding": "#304 found missing Google SDLC / agentic engineering implementation tracking.", "related_issues": [286, 304], "related_prs": [289, 305], "category": "Missing follow-up implementation tickets", "current_reality": "Google SDLC work is evaluation only.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Implementation tickets for additive operating-model concepts.", "recommended_next_action": "Suggest a child issue for Google SDLC operating-model additions.", "priority_recommendation": "P1", "dependency_notes": "Requires owner decision because the source remains candidate framing, not authority.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Implement Google SDLC operating-model additions v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P1", "area:workflow", "area:operating-model", "type:governance"], "hard_boundaries": ["do not promote Google paper to package authority"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not approve named tools or protocols"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Keeps source evaluation separate from operating-model implementation.", "status": "owner-review" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-009", "source_audit_finding": "#304 found missing multi-agent orchestration implementation tracking.", "related_issues": [287, 304], "related_prs": [290, 305], "category": "Missing follow-up implementation tickets", "current_reality": "Multi-agent orchestration is architecture evaluation only.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Queue, state machine, leases, conflict rules, blocking rules, audit trails, and autonomous boundary controls.", "recommended_next_action": "Suggest a child issue for queue-backed work-state controls.", "priority_recommendation": "P1", "dependency_notes": "Requires owner decision before any worker, loop, database, or external tracker implementation.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Implement queue-backed multi-agent work-state controls v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P1", "area:workflow", "area:operating-model", "area:production-readiness", "type:operations"], "hard_boundaries": ["do not implement multi-agent orchestration in this ledger"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not create autonomous loops, scheduled loops, workers, or external queue integrations"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Prevents evaluation documents from being mistaken for orchestration implementation.", "status": "owner-review" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-010", "source_audit_finding": "#304 found Artifact Consistency Auditor implementation may require a follow-up if it must become runnable.", "related_issues": [275, 304], "related_prs": [282, 305], "category": "Missing follow-up implementation tickets", "current_reality": "Artifact Consistency Auditor is workflow guidance and validators, not a standalone runnable auditor.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Owner decision on runnable auditor implementation.", "recommended_next_action": "Decide whether the Artifact Consistency Auditor remains guidance or needs a runnable auditor ticket.", "priority_recommendation": "P2", "dependency_notes": "Can follow mandatory governance cleanup.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Evaluate runnable Artifact Consistency Auditor implementation v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P2", "area:workflow", "type:governance", "type:operations"], "hard_boundaries": ["do not implement a runnable auditor in this ledger"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not mutate controlled artifacts autonomously"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Keeps workflow guidance distinct from executable auditing.", "status": "owner-review" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-011", "source_audit_finding": "#304 found Planner/Executor/Auditor/Reconciler roles may require follow-up if they must become an implemented workflow.", "related_issues": [274, 304], "related_prs": [281, 305], "category": "Missing follow-up implementation tickets", "current_reality": "Roles are operating-model guidance, not a workflow engine.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Owner decision on executable workflow controls.", "recommended_next_action": "Decide whether documented roles should remain operating guidance or become executable workflow controls.", "priority_recommendation": "P2", "dependency_notes": "Should follow owner-review disposition if it affects backlog execution state.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Evaluate executable Planner Executor Auditor Reconciler workflow controls v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P2", "area:workflow", "area:operating-model", "type:operations"], "hard_boundaries": ["do not implement a workflow engine in this ledger"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not add workers, queues, or state-machine mutation"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Prevents role documentation from being treated as executable workflow.", "status": "owner-review" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-012", "source_audit_finding": "#304 listed 22 ambiguous closures requiring owner review before any reopen decision.", "related_issues": [254, 94, 84, 64, 61, 51, 44, 43, 41, 39, 38, 36, 29, 28, 27, 26, 24, 19, 10, 4, 2, 1], "related_prs": [305], "category": "Owner-review decisions", "current_reality": "Ambiguous closures are not dispositioned.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Disposition states: keep closed, reopen, spawn child issue, no implementation planned, defer with rationale.", "recommended_next_action": "Create an owner-review disposition pass.", "priority_recommendation": "P0", "dependency_notes": "Must happen before mechanical reopen or child-ticket creation for ambiguous closures.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Run owner-review disposition pass for ambiguous #304 closures v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P1", "area:workflow", "type:governance", "type:operations"], "hard_boundaries": ["do not reopen issues in this ledger", "do not close open issues in this ledger"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not choose dispositions silently"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Creates explicit owner decisions for ambiguous closure state.", "status": "owner-review" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-013", "source_audit_finding": "#304 found no generated OKF-compatible bundle artifacts.", "related_issues": [285, 304], "related_prs": [288, 305], "category": "OKF implementation path", "current_reality": "OKF-compatible bundle model is documented only.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Generated OKF-compatible bundle artifacts.", "recommended_next_action": "Suggest a child issue to generate OKF-compatible bundle artifacts from Git-controlled sources.", "priority_recommendation": "P1", "dependency_notes": "Should precede OKF projection and adapter work.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Generate OKF-compatible bundle artifacts from Git-controlled sources v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P1", "area:context-pack", "area:data-boundary", "type:architecture"], "hard_boundaries": ["Git remains canonical"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not implement in this ledger"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Adds a concrete artifact target before downstream projections.", "status": "ready-for-ticket" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-014", "source_audit_finding": "#304 found no generated OKF projections.", "related_issues": [285, 304], "related_prs": [288, 305], "category": "OKF implementation path", "current_reality": "Context-pack exists, but OKF projection generation does not.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Deterministic OKF projection generation and projection manifest.", "recommended_next_action": "Suggest a child issue for deterministic OKF projections.", "priority_recommendation": "P1", "dependency_notes": "Depends on bundle artifact model.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Generate deterministic OKF projections and projection manifest v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P1", "area:context-pack", "type:architecture"], "hard_boundaries": ["projections are derived, not authority"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not change package authority"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Prevents parallel corpus drift.", "status": "ready-for-ticket" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-015", "source_audit_finding": "#304 found no derived retrieval index generation.", "related_issues": [285, 304], "related_prs": [288, 305], "category": "OKF implementation path", "current_reality": "No derived retrieval index generator exists for OKF path.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Index generator with fixtures and validation.", "recommended_next_action": "Suggest a child issue for a derived retrieval index generator.", "priority_recommendation": "P1", "dependency_notes": "Requires owner-approved OKF representation.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Add derived retrieval index generator with validation fixtures v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P1", "area:grounded-assistant", "area:data-boundary", "type:architecture"], "hard_boundaries": ["retrieval indexes are derived projections"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not add live runtime retrieval changes"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Creates deterministic generation before runtime use.", "status": "ready-for-ticket" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-016", "source_audit_finding": "#304 found no database/index adapter behavior.", "related_issues": [285, 304], "related_prs": [288, 305], "category": "OKF implementation path", "current_reality": "Cloudflare and Supabase paths are architecture options only.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Owner-approved adapter spike after substrate decision.", "recommended_next_action": "Defer adapter spike until owner chooses Cloudflare, Supabase, dual path, or no runtime substrate.", "priority_recommendation": "P2", "dependency_notes": "Depends on owner substrate decision.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Spike database or index adapter for OKF-derived retrieval v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P2", "area:runtime-adapter", "area:data-boundary", "type:architecture"], "hard_boundaries": ["no database or vector implementation without later approval"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not add Supabase, D1, R2, Vectorize, or MCP behavior"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Blocks accidental infrastructure implementation.", "status": "deferred" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-017", "source_audit_finding": "#304 found no OKF bundle-integrity validation.", "related_issues": [285, 304], "related_prs": [288, 305], "category": "OKF implementation path", "current_reality": "No OKF-specific validation exists.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Bundle integrity checks for source commits, manifests, and hashes.", "recommended_next_action": "Suggest a child issue for OKF bundle-integrity validation.", "priority_recommendation": "P1", "dependency_notes": "Should accompany or follow bundle artifact generation.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Validate OKF bundle integrity source commits manifests and hashes v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P1", "area:context-pack", "type:governance", "type:operations"], "hard_boundaries": ["validation only until implementation lane is approved"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not change runtime behavior"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Makes OKF projection drift mechanically visible.", "status": "ready-for-ticket" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-018", "source_audit_finding": "#304 and #286 identify context engineering as additive but not implemented.", "related_issues": [286, 304], "related_prs": [289, 305], "category": "Google SDLC implementation path", "current_reality": "Context engineering exists only as candidate evaluation guidance.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Context-engineering crosswalk.", "recommended_next_action": "Suggest a child issue to add a context-engineering crosswalk.", "priority_recommendation": "P1", "dependency_notes": "Requires owner-approved treatment of Google SDLC concepts.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Add context-engineering crosswalk to operating model v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P1", "area:workflow", "area:operating-model", "type:governance"], "hard_boundaries": ["candidate framing only"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not promote Google paper to package authority"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Keeps candidate source material from silently becoming doctrine.", "status": "owner-review" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-019", "source_audit_finding": "#304 and #286 identify harness engineering as additive but not implemented.", "related_issues": [286, 304], "related_prs": [289, 305], "category": "Google SDLC implementation path", "current_reality": "Harness engineering is evaluation language only.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Harness-engineering checklist.", "recommended_next_action": "Suggest a child issue to add a harness-engineering checklist.", "priority_recommendation": "P1", "dependency_notes": "Can pair with context-engineering crosswalk.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Add harness-engineering checklist for agent-assisted repo work v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P1", "area:workflow", "area:operating-model", "type:governance"], "hard_boundaries": ["documentation and governance only until separately approved"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not implement runtime harness code"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Separates checklist guidance from runtime implementation.", "status": "owner-review" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-020", "source_audit_finding": "#286 identifies conductor and orchestrator implications for future #287 work only.", "related_issues": [286, 287, 304], "related_prs": [289, 290, 305], "category": "Google SDLC implementation path", "current_reality": "Conductor/orchestrator roles are candidate framing.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Owner decision on whether to add role language before #287 work.", "recommended_next_action": "Defer until the owner chooses the Google SDLC or multi-agent lane.", "priority_recommendation": "P2", "dependency_notes": "May overlap with multi-agent orchestration lane.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Add conductor and orchestrator operating-mode distinctions v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P2", "area:workflow", "area:operating-model", "type:governance"], "hard_boundaries": ["do not start #287"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not implement orchestration"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Keeps terminology from triggering premature orchestration work.", "status": "deferred" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-021", "source_audit_finding": "#286 recommends trajectory evidence as future guidance.", "related_issues": [286, 304], "related_prs": [289, 305], "category": "Google SDLC implementation path", "current_reality": "Trajectory evaluation is not first-class in receipts.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Trajectory-evaluation guidance for agent work receipts.", "recommended_next_action": "Suggest a child issue for trajectory-evaluation guidance.", "priority_recommendation": "P1", "dependency_notes": "Can be implemented as guidance or validator-backed receipt requirement.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Add trajectory-evaluation guidance for agent work receipts v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P1", "area:workflow", "area:operating-model", "type:governance"], "hard_boundaries": ["no autonomous execution"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not add tracing service"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Improves evidence quality for agent work without adding runtime behavior.", "status": "owner-review" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-022", "source_audit_finding": "#286 treats guardrails and hooks as candidate backlog.", "related_issues": [286, 304], "related_prs": [289, 305], "category": "Google SDLC implementation path", "current_reality": "Guardrails and hooks are not implemented.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Decision between validator/template hardening and candidate guidance.", "recommended_next_action": "Decide whether this becomes validator/template hardening or remains candidate guidance.", "priority_recommendation": "P2", "dependency_notes": "May follow #308 anti-manual-toil controls.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Evaluate guardrails and hook controls for agent-assisted repo work v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P2", "area:workflow", "type:governance"], "hard_boundaries": ["do not implement hooks in this ledger"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not add runtime hook behavior"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Prevents unsupported hook claims.", "status": "owner-review" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-023", "source_audit_finding": "#286 maps observability and tracing to existing telemetry and receipts, but no durable tracing service was implemented.", "related_issues": [286, 304], "related_prs": [289, 305], "category": "Google SDLC implementation path", "current_reality": "Observability is receipt and telemetry guidance, not a service.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Owner decision on durable tracing service need.", "recommended_next_action": "Defer service implementation unless owner starts production agent workflow.", "priority_recommendation": "P2", "dependency_notes": "Depends on production agent workflow approval.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Evaluate durable tracing for production agent workflow v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P2", "area:production-readiness", "type:architecture"], "hard_boundaries": ["no durable telemetry service in this ledger"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not add logging or external services"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Separates receipt evidence from production observability infrastructure.", "status": "deferred" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-024", "source_audit_finding": "#286 reinforces eval discipline without adding a new validator.", "related_issues": [286, 304], "related_prs": [289, 305], "category": "Google SDLC implementation path", "current_reality": "Eval discipline exists across docs and validators but this Google SDLC concept is not separately implemented.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Decision on guidance-only or validator-backed eval receipt requirement.", "recommended_next_action": "Decide whether to add guidance only or a validator-backed receipt requirement.", "priority_recommendation": "P1", "dependency_notes": "May be part of mandatory governance cleanup.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Strengthen eval discipline for agent-assisted workflow receipts v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P1", "area:workflow", "type:governance", "type:operations"], "hard_boundaries": ["no runtime eval service"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not approve LM judges as semantic authority"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Improves closeout proof boundaries.", "status": "owner-review" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-025", "source_audit_finding": "#286 treats skills and progressive disclosure as candidate backlog.", "related_issues": [286, 304], "related_prs": [289, 305], "category": "Google SDLC implementation path", "current_reality": "Agent skill boundaries are not formalized as repo implementation.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Controlled skill-boundary note or later implementation plan.", "recommended_next_action": "Decide whether to add a controlled skill-boundary note before any skill-loader implementation.", "priority_recommendation": "P2", "dependency_notes": "Depends on owner intent for Codex skills or tool-neutral skill packaging.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Define agent skill boundaries and progressive disclosure governance v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P2", "area:operating-model", "type:governance"], "hard_boundaries": ["no skill loader implementation"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not approve external tools"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Prevents skill packaging from implying tool approval.", "status": "owner-review" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-026", "source_audit_finding": "#304 found no production agent workflow behavior.", "related_issues": [286, 304], "related_prs": [289, 305], "category": "Google SDLC implementation path", "current_reality": "Production agent workflow is not implemented or approved.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Data, runtime, eval, support, and production boundaries.", "recommended_next_action": "Block until owner approves a production-agent lane.", "priority_recommendation": "P1", "dependency_notes": "Depends on explicit production approval and support model.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Evaluate production agent workflow readiness and controls v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P1", "area:production-readiness", "area:operating-model", "type:governance"], "hard_boundaries": ["no production approval"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not implement production agent workflow"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Prevents candidate production language from being treated as approval.", "status": "blocked" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-027", "source_audit_finding": "#304 found no implemented queue engine, worker process, autonomous loop, scheduled loop, webhook runner, or database-backed work state.", "related_issues": [287, 304], "related_prs": [290, 305], "category": "Multi-agent orchestration implementation path", "current_reality": "GitHub Issues and PRs remain the near-term work substrate.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Queue/state-machine model implementation.", "recommended_next_action": "Suggest a child issue to define repo-controlled work-state labels and transitions.", "priority_recommendation": "P1", "dependency_notes": "Requires owner selection of multi-agent lane.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Define repo-controlled work-state labels and transitions v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P1", "area:workflow", "area:operating-model", "type:operations"], "hard_boundaries": ["no worker implementation"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not implement queue engine"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Keeps state labels explicit before automation.", "status": "owner-review" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-028", "source_audit_finding": "#304 found no true parallel agent claim protocol.", "related_issues": [287, 304], "related_prs": [290, 305], "category": "Multi-agent orchestration implementation path", "current_reality": "Claim semantics are documented only.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Claim metadata and claim rules.", "recommended_next_action": "Suggest a child issue for agent claim semantics.", "priority_recommendation": "P1", "dependency_notes": "Requires state model decision.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Implement agent claim semantics and claim metadata v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P1", "area:workflow", "type:operations"], "hard_boundaries": ["no parallel execution without approved controls"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not run multiple agents"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Prevents duplicate execution.", "status": "owner-review" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-029", "source_audit_finding": "#304 found no stale lease handling or claim lease implementation.", "related_issues": [287, 304], "related_prs": [290, 305], "category": "Multi-agent orchestration implementation path", "current_reality": "Leases are future architecture only.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Lease and stale-claim handling.", "recommended_next_action": "Suggest a child issue for lease handling.", "priority_recommendation": "P1", "dependency_notes": "Depends on claim semantics.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Add lease and stale-claim handling for repo work items v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P1", "area:workflow", "type:operations"], "hard_boundaries": ["no autonomous lease manager"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not add scheduled loops"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Prevents stale work ownership.", "status": "owner-review" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-030", "source_audit_finding": "#287 defines candidate states, but #304 found no implemented state machine.", "related_issues": [287, 304], "related_prs": [290, 305], "category": "Multi-agent orchestration implementation path", "current_reality": "Blocking rules are guidance only.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Blocking and resume rules.", "recommended_next_action": "Suggest a child issue for blocking and resume rules.", "priority_recommendation": "P1", "dependency_notes": "Depends on work-state model.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Add blocking and resume rules for queue-backed work v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P1", "area:workflow", "type:operations"], "hard_boundaries": ["no issue mutation without approval"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not implement state transitions in this ledger"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Makes blocked work state auditable.", "status": "owner-review" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-031", "source_audit_finding": "#304 found no conflict-resolution implementation for parallel claims.", "related_issues": [287, 304], "related_prs": [290, 305], "category": "Multi-agent orchestration implementation path", "current_reality": "Conflict resolution is future architecture only.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Conflict-resolution rules for parallel agent work.", "recommended_next_action": "Suggest a child issue for conflict-resolution rules.", "priority_recommendation": "P1", "dependency_notes": "Depends on claim and lease semantics.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Add conflict-resolution rules for parallel agent work v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P1", "area:workflow", "type:operations"], "hard_boundaries": ["no parallel work engine"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not add external tracker integration"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Prevents contradictory branches and receipts.", "status": "owner-review" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-032", "source_audit_finding": "#304 found no implemented audit trail for planner, executor, auditor, and reconciler roles.", "related_issues": [287, 304], "related_prs": [290, 305], "category": "Multi-agent orchestration implementation path", "current_reality": "Audit trails exist as PRs and receipts, not a role-state trail.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Audit trail requirements and validation for state transitions.", "recommended_next_action": "Suggest a child issue for agent state-transition audit trails.", "priority_recommendation": "P1", "dependency_notes": "Can build on #308 execution-surface receipt controls.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Add audit trail requirements and validation for agent state transitions v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P1", "area:workflow", "type:governance", "type:operations"], "hard_boundaries": ["no runtime tracing service"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not add external audit database"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Keeps delegated work evidence durable.", "status": "owner-review" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-033", "source_audit_finding": "#287 keeps autonomous loops future-only and #304 confirms none are implemented.", "related_issues": [287, 304], "related_prs": [290, 305], "category": "Multi-agent orchestration implementation path", "current_reality": "No autonomous or scheduled execution is approved.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Explicit owner decision before any autonomous execution boundary changes.", "recommended_next_action": "Require explicit owner decision before any autonomous loop, scheduled loop, webhook, worker, or external queue implementation.", "priority_recommendation": "P0", "dependency_notes": "Must precede any multi-agent runtime work.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Define autonomous and scheduled execution boundaries for agent work v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P1", "area:operating-model", "area:production-readiness", "type:governance"], "hard_boundaries": ["no autonomous execution"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not add polling, webhooks, workers, or scheduled loops"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Prevents uncontrolled autonomous execution.", "status": "owner-review" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-034", "source_audit_finding": "#304 records #292, #294, #296, #298, #300, and #302 as implemented child slices.", "related_issues": [269, 292, 294, 296, 298, 300, 302, 304], "related_prs": [293, 295, 297, 299, 301, 303, 305], "category": "Source Registry Admin continuation", "current_reality": "Read-only inspection, receipt generation, Preview dry-run, Preview apply artifact generation, Preview smoke orchestration, and Production promotion dry-run are complete.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "No cleanup required for completed slices.", "recommended_next_action": "Preserve the completed-slice record and do not rerun completed work.", "priority_recommendation": "P2", "dependency_notes": "Use #269 as parent/meta continuity only.", "owner_review_required": false, "implementation_ticket_required": false, "suggested_child_issue_title": "", "suggested_label_set": [], "hard_boundaries": ["do not rerun completed slices"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not start Production apply"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Prevents duplicate child slices.", "status": "no-action" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-035", "source_audit_finding": "#304 records Production apply as not started.", "related_issues": [269, 304], "related_prs": [305], "category": "Source Registry Admin continuation", "current_reality": "Production apply is not started.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Future Production apply child only if owner chooses it.", "recommended_next_action": "Owner may choose a future Production apply child after reviewing this ledger.", "priority_recommendation": "P1", "dependency_notes": "Should follow owner decision and runtime authorization.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Add source registry admin Production apply v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P1", "area:grounded-assistant", "area:data-boundary", "area:runtime-adapter", "area:production-readiness", "type:operations"], "hard_boundaries": ["do not start Production apply in this ledger"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not use Cloudflare CLI/API"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Keeps Production mutation behind explicit owner authorization.", "status": "owner-review" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-036", "source_audit_finding": "#304 records #271 as open and unstarted.", "related_issues": [271, 304], "related_prs": [305], "category": "Source Registry Admin continuation", "current_reality": "#271 extraction-profile continuation is not started.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Future #271 extraction-profile continuation only if owner chooses it.", "recommended_next_action": "Owner may choose #271 extraction-profile continuation only as a separate explicit ticket.", "priority_recommendation": "P1", "dependency_notes": "May depend on OKF decision.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Resume #271 extraction-profile continuation v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P1", "area:context-pack", "area:grounding", "area:data-boundary", "type:governance"], "hard_boundaries": ["do not start #271 in this ledger"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not create extraction profiles"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Keeps extraction work explicitly sequenced.", "status": "owner-review" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-037", "source_audit_finding": "#304 recommends keeping #269 open until owner explicitly closes the parent/meta issue.", "related_issues": [269, 304], "related_prs": [305], "category": "Source Registry Admin continuation", "current_reality": "#269 remains parent/meta.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "No closure action.", "recommended_next_action": "Keep #269 open. Do not close it through this ledger.", "priority_recommendation": "P0", "dependency_notes": "Parent/meta closure requires explicit owner instruction.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": false, "suggested_child_issue_title": "", "suggested_label_set": [], "hard_boundaries": ["do not close #269"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not close parent/meta issues through child PRs"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Prevents accidental parent/meta closure.", "status": "no-action" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-038", "source_audit_finding": "#304 allows future Source Registry Admin slices but does not start them.", "related_issues": [269, 271, 304], "related_prs": [305], "category": "Source Registry Admin continuation", "current_reality": "Possible next slices exist, but none is selected.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Owner decision on Production apply, #271, rollback/emergency-disable hardening, or admin UX.", "recommended_next_action": "Present possible slices to owner without starting them.", "priority_recommendation": "P1", "dependency_notes": "Depends on owner priority and runtime authorization.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Select next Source Registry Admin continuation slice v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P1", "area:grounded-assistant", "area:data-boundary", "area:workflow", "area:production-readiness", "type:governance"], "hard_boundaries": ["do not mutate source registries"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not use Cloudflare CLI/API"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Forces explicit slice choice before runtime-facing work.", "status": "owner-review" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-039", "source_audit_finding": "#304 found 9 closed issues with no labels.", "related_issues": [267, 264, 262, 260, 258, 256, 254, 246, 119, 304], "related_prs": [305], "category": "Label cleanup and parent/child linkage cleanup", "current_reality": "Closed issue label gaps are known.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Explicit metadata cleanup path.", "recommended_next_action": "Decide whether cleanup is automated, manually owner-reviewed, or split into a separate child issue.", "priority_recommendation": "P3", "dependency_notes": "Metadata mutation requires explicit owner authorization.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Apply closed-issue label cleanup from #304 audit v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P2", "area:workflow", "type:operations"], "hard_boundaries": ["do not relabel in this ledger"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not mutate GitHub metadata"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Keeps label hygiene out of planning-only work.", "status": "owner-review" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-040", "source_audit_finding": "#304 found merged PR label gaps.", "related_issues": [304], "related_prs": [305], "category": "Label cleanup and parent/child linkage cleanup", "current_reality": "Merged PR label gaps are known and historical.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Explicit PR label cleanup path.", "recommended_next_action": "Run only an explicit metadata cleanup ticket if owner chooses PR label cleanup.", "priority_recommendation": "P3", "dependency_notes": "Requires owner decision because historical PR metadata will be changed.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Review and apply merged-PR label cleanup from #304 audit v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P3", "area:workflow", "type:operations"], "hard_boundaries": ["do not relabel PRs in this ledger"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not mutate GitHub metadata"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Prevents ad hoc PR metadata cleanup.", "status": "owner-review" }, { "ledger_id": "ARL-041", "source_audit_finding": "#304 found 7 parent/child linkage cleanup flags.", "related_issues": [270, 262, 252, 235, 233, 223, 221, 304], "related_prs": [305], "category": "Label cleanup and parent/child linkage cleanup", "current_reality": "Parent/child linkage cleanup flags are known.", "missing_capability_or_cleanup": "Owner-confirmed explanatory comments or links.", "recommended_next_action": "Add explanatory comments or links only where owner confirms the relationship.", "priority_recommendation": "P2", "dependency_notes": "Requires owner confirmation before comments or link changes.", "owner_review_required": true, "implementation_ticket_required": true, "suggested_child_issue_title": "Review parent-child linkage cleanup from #304 audit v01", "suggested_label_set": ["enhancement", "priority:P2", "area:workflow", "type:governance"], "hard_boundaries": ["do not close or reopen issues in this ledger"], "do_not_start_notes": ["do not infer parent links without owner confirmation"], "recurrence_prevention_implication": "Keeps link cleanup evidence-backed.", "status": "owner-review" } ] }